Why has "oh, but I'm gay" become a default excuse for immorality? Now it's the reason Lil Nas X needs to make a satan shoe with human blood?" On Monday, she tweeted, "Why has 'oh, but I'm gay' become a default excuse for immorality?. Author and political commentator Candace Owens was one of the more prominent people who criticized the shoes' demonic imagery, as well as the scene of Lil Nas X lap-dancing on Satan in the "Montero" video. He also said MSCHF has yet to be contacted by Nike.Ĭonservative figures have been decrying the shoes since their release was announced on March 26. One of MSCHF's founders, Daniel Greenberg, responded to an email from Newsweek about the "Satan Shoes," which he described as "a direct follow up to our Jesus shoe." As to whose idea the collaboration was between the collective and Lil Nas X for the blood-containing Nikes, he said it was MSCHF's idea. Before "Satan Shoes," MSCHF once made "Jesus Shoes." Also designed using Nike Air Max 97 sneakers, the 2019 limited-edition "Jesus Shoes" made headlines because they came with a steel crucifix and what the company claimed was "holy water" from the Jordan River. To pick them up, one had to download the official MSCHF app from. The "Satan Shoes" went on sale at 11:00 a.m. In a statement, Nike wrote: "Nike did not design or release these shoes and we do not endorse them." Instead, it was New York-based art collective MSCHF who made "Satan Shoes" using Nike Air Max 97s. And the controversy over the footwear also comes amid the equally provocative video for Lil Nas X's new hit single, "Montero (Call Me By My Name)."ĭespite the presence of the infamous swoosh on the side, the shoes are not a direct design of Nike. The $1,018 price attached to them is a reference to the Bible passage Luke 10:18, which reads: "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven." Naturally, all of the devil themes around the shoes have drawn the ire of some conservative pundits. Only 666 pairs of the black and red sneakers were produced in the limited edition run. That inventory was relatively small, though. “Damn y’all happy now.Lil Nas X at the 62nd Annual GRAMMY Awards at Staples Center on Januin Los Angeles, California. “We decided to drop these to even the score,” he wrote via Twitter. The photo shows a shoe in white with a nod to the Bible verse John 3:16 and “My Pleasure,” which is quoted on the sneaker. The rapper further responded to the controversy by tweeting a parody version of his custom sneaker collab that would appease his haters: a “Chick-Fil-A” Nike Air Max 97. (The aforementioned music video is filled with demonic imagery.) However, the video only shows the rapper holding the shoe before cutting into scenes from his “Montero (Call Me by Your Name)” music video. Separately on Sunday, Lil Nas X uploaded a YouTube video, which he said was an apology. (Today’s complaint notes examples of the social media criticism that surfaced when users connected Nike to the shoe.) “Nike did not design or release these shoes and we do not endorse them,” a spokesperson said. The Bible scripture Luke 10:18 is also featured on the side of the kick.Īfter the shoes were revealed - and some social media users bashed Nike for the release - the Swoosh confirmed this weekend that it had no part in the creation of the shoe. Additionally, only 666 pairs would be released and each shoe would be individually number in red embroidery. The account shared that the shoes contain actual human blood and would come with a $1,018 price tag. On Friday, Saint, a sneaker and streetwear social media account, tweeted campaign imagery of the MSCHF x Lil Nas X “Satan Shoes,” which are the classic Air Max 97s reimagined with black uppers and red detailing. Nike Is Bringing Back the Kobe 4 Protro in ‘Black Mamba’ for the Holidays
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |